DWIANTO RUDI WIDAGDA, 22314455 (2026) ANALISIS HUKUM ATAS TUNTUTAN PEMERINTAH DESA TERHADAP ASET TANAH PT PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA I REGIONAL 5 (Studi Kasus Tanah Eks Pabrik Gula Djatie Desa Jatirejo, Kecamatan Loceret, Kabupaten Nganjuk). Diploma thesis, Politeknik Agraria STPN.
|
Text
Dwianto Rudi Widagda_22314455.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
The former Djatie Sugar Factory land in Jatirejo Village, Loceret District, Nganjuk Regency, held by PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5 under a Building Use Right (Hak Guna Bangunan), has long remained unproductive, prompting a claim by the Village Government. This study aims to analyze the legal standing of the Jatirejo Village Government’s claim, to formulate a dispute resolution scheme, and to examine its legal implications for legal certainty and the status of the land asset. This research employs normative legal research (juridical-normative) that is prescriptive and qualitative in nature, using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are analyzed through legal interpretation and construction guided by the Four-Pillar Integral Reflection Methodology (Metodologi Refleksi Integral 4 Pilar) to dissect the root of the problem teleologically and to test the causal logic between norms, while informants’ statements are positioned as factual context. The assessment of legal effectiveness is limited to the legal factor, namely the substance of legislation. The results show that the Village Government’s claim has a valid juridical basis under Law Number 3 of 2024, supported by indications of abandoned land (Government Regulation Number 20 of 2021), inconsistency in fulfilling the elements of the Building Use Right, the social function principle of land (Article 6 of the Basic Agrarian Law), and a legal question concerning the validity of the nationalization process that must be evaluated by the competent authority. Nevertheless, PT Perkebunan Nusantara retains a strong formal position through its registered certificate and the status of separated state assets; yet, under logical (mantiq) examination, a fallacy of misplaced priority (hysteron proteron) is identified, in which the corporation places administrative fear over state assets above its obligation to fulfill the social function of land, so the claim does not by itself create a right of control. The recommended resolution is a phased non-litigation pathway culminating in the granting of land rights over a Management Right (Hak Pengelolaan), with the designation of state land as a prerequisite, while litigation serves as a last resort. This resolution, through the Management Right scheme, implies the realization of just legal certainty (teleology), whereby state assets remain legally secured while the land’s function is restored for the greatest prosperity of the people as mandated by Article 33(3) of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: abandoned land; Building Use Right; Four-Pillar Integral Reflection Methodology; separated state assets; Management Right; land dispute resolution
| Item Type: | Thesis (Diploma) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD29 Pertanahan |
| Divisions: | Prodi Diploma IV Pertanahan |
| Depositing User: | yosep ka perpus |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Sep 2026 03:40 |
| Last Modified: | 22 Sep 2026 03:40 |
| URI: | http://repository.stpn.ac.id/id/eprint/5066 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
